Published on 27 January 2017 in Client Alerts
On 24 January 2017, the International Trade Committee of the European Parliament voted in favour of approving the Canada-European Union (“EU”) Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (“CETA” or the “Agreement”). After a nearly nine-year process of consultations, negotiation and legal review, the CETA therefore took one crucial step closer to its provisional entry into force.
The Agreement must now be approved by the European Parliament, in a vote scheduled for February 2017. Canada is engaged in a similar parliamentary approval process. Both parties anticipate a positive outcome. Once parliamentary approval is secured, those aspects of the Agreement falling exclusively within EU competency will provisionally be applied as of April 2017.
Provisional entry into force will grant Canadian and European businesses the advantages of virtually all aspects of the Agreement, including:
Overall, the provisional entry into force of the CETA stands to provide European and Canadian business immediate, substantial new trading and investment advantages and access, as well as mechanisms to promote future enhancements to Canada-EU trade and investment conditions.
As for the aspects of the CETA not subject to provisional application, they include some substantive investment protections – notably, the specifically-defined “fair and equitable treatment” obligation, and protection against expropriation – as well as the proposed Investment Court System for enforcement of investor-State obligations. To the extent provisionally adopted, investment protections will be limited to “foreign direct investment” (i.e., excluding portfolio investment (passive minority shareholding)).
These carve-outs from provisional application reflect current controversies within the EU regarding the so-called “mixed competency” for investment protection, and related calls for parliamentary approval of these aspects of the Agreement by each Member State’s national parliament.
The latter approvals are not guaranteed. However, by the time full ratification is sought, the advantages of the Agreement in terms of enhanced trade and investment conditions should already be apparent, and its effects felt. National parliaments may be reluctant to put in jeopardy these advantages. In this way, provisional entry into force of the CETA could help haul the Agreement over the ultimate finish line.
Pending full entry into force of the CETA’s investment protections, existing foreign investment promotion and protection agreements (“FIPAs”) between Canada and a range of Eastern European States will remain in force. These existing protections therefore should remain an important consideration for Canadian businesses structuring investments in Europe, and vice versa.
On 3 August 2025, Algeria adopted Law No. 25‑12 of 3 August 2025 governing mining activities, which was published in the Official Journal No. 52 on 7 August 2025 (“New Mining Law”). The law repeals the previous mining regime established under Law No. 14-05 of 24 February 2014.
Learn more
In September 2025, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (“ITLOS”) adopted amendments to its Guidelines concerning the Preparation and Presentation of Cases before the Tribunal (“Guidelines”). The revised text updates the Guidelines that the Tribunal originally adopted in 1997.
Learn more
Specialized press reported that on 8 May 2025, the Russian Federation (“Russia”) and the People’s Republic of China (“China”) reportedly signed a bilateral investment treaty “on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments” (“BIT”), to update and put an end to the 2006 bilateral investment treaty previously signed by the countries (“2006 Agreement”).
Learn more
On 24 September 2025, the National Competitive Centre (“NCC”) of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (“KSA”) published the “Draft of Arbitration Law” (the “Draft Arbitration Law” or the “DAL”), following the Council of Ministers’ June 2025 Resolution, as part of KSA’s efforts to modernise the regulatory framework of arbitration, with the objective of “enhancing perceptions of arbitration in the Kingdom, in a manner that positively reflects on the relevant international indicators”.
Learn more