Published on 20 February 2024 in Client Alerts
The Hague Judgments Convention establishes a uniform framework for the mutual recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments within its member States. Although many States contain domestic laws on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, these rules are not uniform. As a result, businesses seeking to enforce the decisions of courts in foreign jurisdictions often face delays, high costs and uncertainty. The Convention applies to the recognition and enforcement of civil judgments from foreign jurisdictions but provides a host of exclusions including matters concerning family law, insolvency, defamation, and anti-trust issues. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments may be refused for reasons including improper notification of the claim, fraud, inconsistency with earlier judgments in the State of origin or the recognising State and issues of public policy. Additionally, enforcement may be postponed if parties have commenced appellate proceedings in the State of origin.
The Hague Judgments Convention has been welcomed by businesses in the UK, especially as judgments could no longer be mutually recognised between the UK and EU under the Brussels I Regulation and the Lugano Convention following Brexit. Although the UK has ratified the Hague Convention of 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, this Convention only applies when parties have an exclusive consent-to-jurisdiction clause in their contracts.
Volterra Fietta recently invited clients, colleagues and members of its wider international network to participate in an interactive audience poll to help shape the firm’s upcoming seminar programme.
Learn more
Volterra Fietta has continued its series of seminars and thought leadership events during the first half of 2026. The programme presents leading experts on different public international law and dispute resolution issues, including the firm’s lawyers, academics, technical and scientific experts, diplomats and other leading practitioners.
Learn more
This latest commentary by Ahmed Abdel-Hakam explores the role of valuation in oil and gas arbitration, an area that sits at the intersection of international law, economics, finance, and complex dispute resolution. Valuation is often one of the most significant and technically demanding aspects of disputes involving oil and gas assets. Whether arising in investor-State or
Learn more
Effective Quantum Strategies for Investors in Investment Treaty Arbitrations In this commentary, Robert G Volterra explores the strategic considerations involved in pleading quantum damages in investment treaty arbitrations. Drawing on years of practical experience acting for both investors and States, and as an arbitrator in investor-State disputes, Robert examines how parties approach quantum and the factors
Learn more