Published on 20 November 2023 in Client Alerts
In response to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, the EU has expanded its sanctions package on Russia.
Among the most significant and controversial of these measures is the blocking of almost €300 billion of CBR’s reserves held by the EU and other G7 partners. Following this action, in October 2022, the European Council requested the Commission to present options for utilising frozen Russian assets for the reconstruction of Ukraine. The European Commission has noted that in order to “make the most out of this funds and start rebuilding Ukraine”, it has proposed to set up a structure to manage the frozen public funds, which involves investing them to use the proceeds for Ukraine’s benefit.
The move to seize Russian assets has since been gaining traction beyond the EU circles. In September, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and British Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt have expressed support for a European Union plan to implement a windfall tax on profits generated by frozen Russian sovereign assets, which will be used to help finance the reconstruction of Ukraine.
Belgium’s move to seize €1.7 billion from the taxes charged on profits generated from frozen Russian assets will have far reaching legal and political repercussions. It has been recently reported that the European Central Bank, in a draft internal EU note, has warned against requisitioning CBR’s assets, which could potentially damage the Euro’s position as Europe’s common currency. This move also comes following reporting of an unpublished document in which EU authorities concluded that European authorities cannot legally seize CBR’s assets to fund efforts to help Ukraine.
This move from Belgium appears to be an early indicator of what’s to come. Belgium’s €1.7 billion fund remains a marginal amount to support the overall efforts to rebuild Ukraine, as the World Bank estimated in April that the total cost of the damage is $411 billion. Belgian clearing house Euroclear manages almost €125 billion of frozen CBR assets.
This insightful piece by Ahmed Abdel-Hakam examines the escalating global State rush for critical minerals and the complex legal interaction between State-to-State Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and existing International Investment Treaties. Ahmed Abdel-Hakam is a Partner at Volterra Fietta. He is a Solicitor-Advocate (Civil and Criminal Higher Rights of Audience) before the Higher Courts of England & Wales and a French
Learn more
We are excited to share the first instalment of the “Volterra Fietta PIL commentaries” podcast series. In each podcast, a Volterra Fietta partner will explain an international legal issue in an easily-digestible, bite-size segment. The series will support informed decision-making, risk assessment and strategic planning for those acting for, against or with States. The opening instalment
Learn more
Over the past year, Volterra Fietta was hired by clients in multiple new, complex and ground-breaking disputes before international and domestic courts and tribunals. For those new cases which involve a precise damages figure (for example, not counting boundary disputes at the International Court of Justice), the combined total claim value exceeds USD 40,000,000,000 (forty
Learn more
Volterra Fietta is pleased to announce the launch of “Volterra Fietta PIL commentaries” a new monthly commentary series by the partners of the firm, beginning Monday, 26 January. The series will present perspectives of seasoned public international law professionals with unique practical experience advising and representing clients. The partners will address selected concepts, principles, and
Learn more