Published on 15 April 2025 in Client Alerts

Ahmed Abdel Hakam speaks on panel with the Secretary General of the Arbitration Centre of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (“OIC”) during Paris Arbitration Week 2025

On 11 April 2025, Volterra Fietta Partner Ahmed Abdel Hakam spoke at a seminar hosted by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Arbitration Centre (“OIC”) during Paris Arbitration Week 2025.  The topic of the seminar was “Bridging the Gap: Streamlining Dispute Resolution for Investment and Trade in the OIC Member States”.  The panel included Dr Umar Oseni, the Secretary General of the OIC Arbitration Centre and Ahmed Abdel Hakam.

Photo: Dr Umar Oseni (left) and Ahmed Abdel Hakam (right)

Dr Umar Oseni gave an overview of the OIC’s efforts to modernise its Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments (“OIC Investment Agreement”).  He also described the activities of the OIC’s Arbitration Centre, which is based in Istanbul, Türkiye.

Ahmed Abdel Hakam shared practical insights from his experience as an advocate in a number of investor-State arbitrations that have been brought under Article 17 of the OIC Investment Agreement.  He explained the legal issues which arise from the interpretation of Article 17.  These include the existence (or lack thereof) of State consent to arbitration and related procedural issues, such as seeking the appointment of an arbitrator via an appointing authority not provided under the OIC Investment Agreement. 

Photo: Ahmed Abdel Hakam (third from right) speaking at Paris Arbitration Week 2025

Ahmed shared with the audience his experiences advising and representing both multinational companies and States for more than two decades, in investment treaty arbitrations under Bilateral Investment Treaties and Multilateral Investment Treaties such as the OIC Investment Agreement.  Ahmed currently sits on the Dispute Resolution Committee of the Law Society of England & Wales and is a member of the International Law Committee of the New York City Bar Association.  He is Co-Chair of the Dispute Resolution Section of the African Society of International Law.  He is currently advising and representing investors and States in relation to investment disputes involving Europe, the Americas, Asia and Africa.

For further information, please contact info@volterrafietta.com.

More Client Alerts

| Client Alerts

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia approves regulatory frameworks for its Special Economic Zones

The Saudi Council’s ministerial Resolution No. 468, published in the Official Gazette on 16 January 2026, approves the governance regulations for each of the Special Economic Zones (“SEZs”), the King Abdullah Economic City SEZ, Ras Al Khair SEZ, Jazan SEZ and Cloud Computing SEZ, originally launched on 13 April 2023. 

Learn more

| Client Alerts

UN General assembly adopts resolution to improve coordination against Human Trafficking

On 18 December 2025, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution aimed at improving international coordination in efforts to combat trafficking in persons, reaffirming the need for a comprehensive and cooperative global response to one of the most pervasive forms of transnational organised crime.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

India and EU sign an FTA labelled “the mother of all deals”

On 27 January 2026, India and the European Union (the “EU”) signed a free trade agreement (“FTA”), after over two decades worth of negotiations.  The FTA, called by some as the “mother of all deals”, is the largest deal ever signed by these two parties.  The FTA is expected to cover a market of over USD 24 trillion and aims to save over €4 billion per year in duties on European products.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

United States withdraws from WHO and dozens of international organisations

In January 2026, the United States formally completed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (“WHO”) and announced its intention to withdraw from 66 total international organisations and multilateral bodies, including numerous United Nations-affiliated entities.  The decision follows a broader governmental review assessing participation in international institutions against perceived U.S. national interests.

Learn more
View all