Published on 27 January 2017 in Client Alerts

CETA moves a step closer to provisional application

On 24 January 2017, the International Trade Committee of the European Parliament voted in favour of approving the Canada-European Union (“EU”) Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (“CETA” or the “Agreement”).   After a nearly nine-year process of consultations, negotiation and legal review, the CETA therefore took one crucial step closer to its provisional entry into force.

The Agreement must now be approved by the European Parliament, in a vote scheduled for February 2017.   Canada is engaged in a similar parliamentary approval process.  Both parties anticipate a positive outcome.  Once parliamentary approval is secured, those aspects of the Agreement falling exclusively within EU competency will provisionally be applied as of April 2017.

Provisional entry into force will grant Canadian and European businesses the advantages of virtually all aspects of the Agreement, including:

Overall, the provisional entry into force of the CETA stands to provide European and Canadian business immediate, substantial new trading and investment advantages and access, as well as mechanisms to promote future enhancements to Canada-EU trade and investment conditions.

As for the aspects of the CETA not subject to provisional application, they include some substantive investment protections – notably, the specifically-defined “fair and equitable treatment” obligation, and protection against expropriation – as well as the proposed Investment Court System for enforcement of investor-State obligations.  To the extent provisionally adopted, investment protections will be limited to “foreign direct investment” (i.e., excluding portfolio investment (passive minority shareholding)).

These carve-outs from provisional application reflect current controversies within the EU regarding the so-called “mixed competency” for investment protection, and related calls for parliamentary approval of these aspects of the Agreement by each Member State’s national parliament.

The latter approvals are not guaranteed.  However, by the time full ratification is sought, the advantages of the Agreement in terms of enhanced trade and investment conditions should already be apparent, and its effects felt.  National parliaments may be reluctant to put in jeopardy these advantages.   In this way, provisional entry into force of the CETA could help haul the Agreement over the ultimate finish line.

Pending full entry into force of the CETA’s investment protections, existing foreign investment promotion and protection agreements (“FIPAs”) between Canada and a range of Eastern European States will remain in force.  These existing protections therefore should remain an important consideration for Canadian businesses structuring investments in Europe, and vice versa.

More Client Alerts

| Client Alerts

Publication of Law Over Borders: Arbitration Guide, edited by Volterra Fietta Partners Ahmed Abdel-Hakam, Gunjan Sharma and Robert G Volterra

The second edition of the “Law over borders: Arbitration Guide” has been released by the publishers. The Guide is edited by Volterra Fietta Partners Robert G Volterra, Gunjan Sharma and Ahmed Abdel-Hakam.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

Revamping India’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty

Nearly ten years after its 2015 Model Bilateral Investment Treaty was released, India is now set again to revamp its approach to bilateral investment treaties (“BITs”) – this time, in order better to attract and incentivise inbound foreign investment. 

Learn more

| Client Alerts

International Maritime Organization approves new net-zero regulations for global shipping

In April 2025, after nearly 10 years of negotiations, the International Maritime Organization (the “IMO”) approved new net-zero regulations for global shipping.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania set to become first States to exit global land mines treaty

Between April and June 2025, the Parliaments of Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania each voted to approve their country’s exits from the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction (the “Ottawa Convention”).

Learn more
View all