Published on 3 July 2019 in Client Alerts

The General Court of the European Union annuls the European Commission’s Decision on State Aid in the Micula case (Micula v. Romania)

On 18 June 2019, the General Court of the European Union (“GCEU”) handed down its judgment in the case of Micula v. Romania and annulled the 2015 European Commission’s decision that the award rendered by an arbitral tribunal in 2013, obliging Romania to pay €178 million to the investors, constituted illegal State aid under European Union (“EU”) law and forbidding Romania from performing the arbitral award.

The arbitration case had been brought by five investors, including the Micula brothers, against Romania on the basis of Romania’s 2005 repeal of the incentives it had granted in 1998 under the Emergency Governance Ordinance (“EGO”) to certain investors in disfavoured regions.  The repeal was part of Romania’s accession process to the European Union with a view to eliminating all forms of State aid in national legislation incompatible with the acquis communautaire.

In March 2015, the European Commission adopted the contested decision according to which partial payment of the award by Romania constituted illegal State aid.  This decision required Romania to suspend further implementation or execution of the arbitral award.

In a judgment delivered on 18 June 2019, the GCEU held that the State aid measure by Romania was not incompatible with EU law.  As the EGO incentives were repealed prior to Romania’s accession to the EU, the Commission had no competence to assess their unlawfulness in light of EU law, according to the GCEU.  Thus, the State aid rules did not bind Romania prior to its accession to the EU.

The GCEU also held that the Commission had retroactively applied its powers and that it could not classify the measure at issue as State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.

In light of the Sweden-Romania BIT, the GCEU distinguished the Micula case from the Achmea case.  The GCEU held that the Micula arbitral tribunal was not bound to apply EU law to events occurring prior to Romania’s accession to the EU.

On this basis, the GCEU annulled the Commission’s contested decision in its entirety.

The GCEU’s decision is subject to appeal before the Court of Justice of the EU.

More Client Alerts

| Client Alerts

Publication of Law Over Borders: Arbitration Guide, edited by Volterra Fietta Partners Ahmed Abdel-Hakam, Gunjan Sharma and Robert G Volterra

The second edition of the “Law over borders: Arbitration Guide” has been released by the publishers. The Guide is edited by Volterra Fietta Partners Robert G Volterra, Gunjan Sharma and Ahmed Abdel-Hakam.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

Revamping India’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty

Nearly ten years after its 2015 Model Bilateral Investment Treaty was released, India is now set again to revamp its approach to bilateral investment treaties (“BITs”) – this time, in order better to attract and incentivise inbound foreign investment. 

Learn more

| Client Alerts

International Maritime Organization approves new net-zero regulations for global shipping

In April 2025, after nearly 10 years of negotiations, the International Maritime Organization (the “IMO”) approved new net-zero regulations for global shipping.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania set to become first States to exit global land mines treaty

Between April and June 2025, the Parliaments of Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania each voted to approve their country’s exits from the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction (the “Ottawa Convention”).

Learn more
View all