Published on 25 February 2020 in Client Alerts
In December 2019, Cyprus filed a petition with the International Court of Justice in The Hague to resolve a dispute it has with Turkey concerning certain offshore mineral rights in the Mediterranean Sea. The content of Cyprus’s ICJ petition has not yet been disclosed, so the exact content of its claim against Turkey is unclear.
The Dispute about oil and gas in the Mediterranean Sea
Turkey and Cyprus are neighbours that disagree about the delimitation of their respective sovereign rights to the seabed of the Mediterranean Sea.
In 2018, Turkish naval vessels stopped a vessel chartered by ENI, a Cypriot concessionaire, from drilling for gas in the disputed area. In May 2019, Turkey authorised a vessel to begin drilling operations in an area west of Cyprus that is claimed by Cyprus. In November 2019, concerns about the maritime dispute between the two States caused United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to re-engage in efforts at brokering a settlement between them.
Response of the European Union
Cyprus, but not Turkey, is a member of the European Union.
The European Council, an EU body, has expressed “serious concerns” over what it calls “Turkey’s current illegal drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean”. Partly as a result, in July 2019, the European Council decided to endorse the European Commission’s proposal to reduce pre-EU-accession assistance to Turkey for 2020. The European Council also invited the European Investment Bank to review its lending activities in Turkey. In November 2019, the European Council adopted a framework for restrictive measures that might target individuals or entities involved in drilling activities for hydrocarbons in disputed areas of the Eastern Mediterranean.
In response, Turkey has asserted its sovereign control over the relevant part of the seabed, saying that the oil and gas in question is found in its continental shelf.
More generally around the world, recent technological developments in deepwater and ultra-deepwater drilling have expanded seaward the maritime areas in which commercial hydrocarbon exploitation can take place. At the same time, hundreds of maritime boundaries have still not been delimited between States. Cyprus’s submission to the International Court of Justice is just one of many disputes that have arisen, or might arise in the near future, based on competing State claims to maritime areas that have favourable prospects for offshore oil and gas reserves.
Over the past year, Volterra Fietta was hired by clients in multiple new, complex and ground-breaking disputes before international and domestic courts and tribunals. For those new cases which involve a precise damages figure (for example, not counting boundary disputes at the International Court of Justice), the combined total claim value exceeds USD 40,000,000,000 (forty
Learn more
Volterra Fietta is pleased to announce the launch of “Volterra Fietta PIL commentaries” a new monthly commentary series by the partners of the firm, beginning Monday, 26 January. The series will present perspectives of seasoned public international law professionals with unique practical experience advising and representing clients. The partners will address selected concepts, principles, and
Learn more
These include: In addition, Volterra Fietta has once again been ranked Band A/Tier 1 for Public International Law by both Chambers & Partners and the Legal 500. Robert Volterra’s practice, including at Volterra Fietta, has maintained these top rankings for almost 30 years. Volterra Fietta has also been highly ranked for International Arbitration by both
Learn more
随着中国不断强调双边投资协定在保护其对外投资中的重要作用,并鼓励中国投资者运用国际法机制来保障自身权益,Volterra Fietta 受邀为这一重要倡议作出贡献。
In the past couple of decades China has become the world’s biggest overseas investor. Chinese State-Owned-Enterprises and private businesses have spent trillions of dollars in foreign investments. Inevitably, disputes arise between Chinese companies and foreign governments and business counterparties.
Learn more