Published on 3 July 2019 in Client Alerts

The General Court of the European Union annuls the European Commission’s Decision on State Aid in the Micula case (Micula v. Romania)

On 18 June 2019, the General Court of the European Union (“GCEU”) handed down its judgment in the case of Micula v. Romania and annulled the 2015 European Commission’s decision that the award rendered by an arbitral tribunal in 2013, obliging Romania to pay €178 million to the investors, constituted illegal State aid under European Union (“EU”) law and forbidding Romania from performing the arbitral award.

The arbitration case had been brought by five investors, including the Micula brothers, against Romania on the basis of Romania’s 2005 repeal of the incentives it had granted in 1998 under the Emergency Governance Ordinance (“EGO”) to certain investors in disfavoured regions.  The repeal was part of Romania’s accession process to the European Union with a view to eliminating all forms of State aid in national legislation incompatible with the acquis communautaire.

In March 2015, the European Commission adopted the contested decision according to which partial payment of the award by Romania constituted illegal State aid.  This decision required Romania to suspend further implementation or execution of the arbitral award.

In a judgment delivered on 18 June 2019, the GCEU held that the State aid measure by Romania was not incompatible with EU law.  As the EGO incentives were repealed prior to Romania’s accession to the EU, the Commission had no competence to assess their unlawfulness in light of EU law, according to the GCEU.  Thus, the State aid rules did not bind Romania prior to its accession to the EU.

The GCEU also held that the Commission had retroactively applied its powers and that it could not classify the measure at issue as State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.

In light of the Sweden-Romania BIT, the GCEU distinguished the Micula case from the Achmea case.  The GCEU held that the Micula arbitral tribunal was not bound to apply EU law to events occurring prior to Romania’s accession to the EU.

On this basis, the GCEU annulled the Commission’s contested decision in its entirety.

The GCEU’s decision is subject to appeal before the Court of Justice of the EU.

More Client Alerts

| Client Alerts

Volterra Fietta engaging with China’s “going-abroad” policy Volterra Fietta 为中国“走出去”战略贡献力量

随着中国不断强调双边投资协定在保护其对外投资中的重要作用,并鼓励中国投资者运用国际法机制来保障自身权益,Volterra Fietta 受邀为这一重要倡议作出贡献。

In the past couple of decades China has become the world’s biggest overseas investor.  Chinese State-Owned-Enterprises and private businesses have spent trillions of dollars in foreign investments.  Inevitably, disputes arise between Chinese companies and foreign governments and business counterparties.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

Volterra Fietta ranks again at the top tier in the world’s leading independant global legal directories (Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners)

Volterra Fietta has been recognised at the top tier of law firms specialising in public international law and international dispute resolution, for yet another year.  These rankings continue Volterra Fietta’s uninterrupted perfect record in these global legal directories, held since it was founded in 2011.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

Algeria adopts new mining law

On 3 August 2025, Algeria adopted Law No. 25‑12 of 3 August 2025 governing mining activities, which was published in the Official Journal No. 52 on 7 August 2025 (“New Mining Law”). The law repeals the previous mining regime established under Law No. 14-05 of 24 February 2014.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

ITLOS amends guidelines on the preparation and presentation of cases before the Tribunal

In September 2025, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (“ITLOS”) adopted amendments to its Guidelines concerning the Preparation and Presentation of Cases before the Tribunal (“Guidelines”).  The revised text updates the Guidelines that the Tribunal originally adopted in 1997.

Learn more
View all