Published on 22 April 2020 in Client Alerts

Legal actions demanding reparations from China over COVID-19

A number of legal actions have been brought before national courts and international bodies against the People’s Republic of China, over its alleged failure to contain the COVID-19 outbreak.

*

On 21 April 2020, the Attorney General of the State of Missouri announced the State’s filing of a civil lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri against the Government of China and Chinese officials and institutions.  The suit claims that alleged actions by China to suppress information, arrest whistleblowers and deny the contagious nature of the Coronavirus led to severe economic damage and loss of life in Missouri.

Although this is the first lawsuit against China by a US state government entity, several class action lawsuits have already been filed in US courts by private groups seeking monetary damages, with some aiming to recover trillions of dollars in damages from China.

These lawsuits face significant legal challenges.  The US Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 strictly limits the possibility to sue foreign States and their agencies before US courts.  The Act establishes the immunity of States from civil jurisdiction in the US, subject only to very limited exceptions.  The principle of foreign State immunity is widely recognised in international law – the vast majority of States have enacted legislation that provides for sovereign immunity.

*

On 3 April 2020, a complaint against China was filed before the United Nations Human Rights Council by the London-based International Council of Jurists, the All India Bar Association and Adish C. Aggarwala – chairman of the All India Bar Association and president of the International Council of Jurists.  According to the complaint, China’s alleged actions violated several norms of international law, including provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Health Regulations (2005), for which it is liable under the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on Responsibility for International Wrongful Acts 2001.

*

It remains to be seen whether disputes over COVID-19 will also arise on an inter-State level.  On 20 April 2020, a group of US Republican lawmakers requested US President Donald Trump to bring a case against China before the International Court of Justice.  The grounds on which to do so were not clearly identified.

*

Apart from China, residents of a suburban New York City county have initiated a class action against the World Health Organisation over alleged failures to adequately respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

*

For further information, please contact info@volterrafietta.com.

More Client Alerts

| Client Alerts

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia approves regulatory frameworks for its Special Economic Zones

The Saudi Council’s ministerial Resolution No. 468, published in the Official Gazette on 16 January 2026, approves the governance regulations for each of the Special Economic Zones (“SEZs”), the King Abdullah Economic City SEZ, Ras Al Khair SEZ, Jazan SEZ and Cloud Computing SEZ, originally launched on 13 April 2023. 

Learn more

| Client Alerts

UN General assembly adopts resolution to improve coordination against Human Trafficking

On 18 December 2025, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution aimed at improving international coordination in efforts to combat trafficking in persons, reaffirming the need for a comprehensive and cooperative global response to one of the most pervasive forms of transnational organised crime.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

India and EU sign an FTA labelled “the mother of all deals”

On 27 January 2026, India and the European Union (the “EU”) signed a free trade agreement (“FTA”), after over two decades worth of negotiations.  The FTA, called by some as the “mother of all deals”, is the largest deal ever signed by these two parties.  The FTA is expected to cover a market of over USD 24 trillion and aims to save over €4 billion per year in duties on European products.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

United States withdraws from WHO and dozens of international organisations

In January 2026, the United States formally completed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (“WHO”) and announced its intention to withdraw from 66 total international organisations and multilateral bodies, including numerous United Nations-affiliated entities.  The decision follows a broader governmental review assessing participation in international institutions against perceived U.S. national interests.

Learn more
View all