Published on 22 April 2020 in Client Alerts

Legal actions demanding reparations from China over COVID-19

A number of legal actions have been brought before national courts and international bodies against the People’s Republic of China, over its alleged failure to contain the COVID-19 outbreak.

*

On 21 April 2020, the Attorney General of the State of Missouri announced the State’s filing of a civil lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri against the Government of China and Chinese officials and institutions.  The suit claims that alleged actions by China to suppress information, arrest whistleblowers and deny the contagious nature of the Coronavirus led to severe economic damage and loss of life in Missouri.

Although this is the first lawsuit against China by a US state government entity, several class action lawsuits have already been filed in US courts by private groups seeking monetary damages, with some aiming to recover trillions of dollars in damages from China.

These lawsuits face significant legal challenges.  The US Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 strictly limits the possibility to sue foreign States and their agencies before US courts.  The Act establishes the immunity of States from civil jurisdiction in the US, subject only to very limited exceptions.  The principle of foreign State immunity is widely recognised in international law – the vast majority of States have enacted legislation that provides for sovereign immunity.

*

On 3 April 2020, a complaint against China was filed before the United Nations Human Rights Council by the London-based International Council of Jurists, the All India Bar Association and Adish C. Aggarwala – chairman of the All India Bar Association and president of the International Council of Jurists.  According to the complaint, China’s alleged actions violated several norms of international law, including provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Health Regulations (2005), for which it is liable under the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on Responsibility for International Wrongful Acts 2001.

*

It remains to be seen whether disputes over COVID-19 will also arise on an inter-State level.  On 20 April 2020, a group of US Republican lawmakers requested US President Donald Trump to bring a case against China before the International Court of Justice.  The grounds on which to do so were not clearly identified.

*

Apart from China, residents of a suburban New York City county have initiated a class action against the World Health Organisation over alleged failures to adequately respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

*

For further information, please contact info@volterrafietta.com.

More Client Alerts

| Client Alerts

European Commission set to adopt first European Space Law

In the brief 60 years of space flight, humanity has sent over 60,000 space objects and 1 million pieces of smaller debris into orbit around the planet.  This has created the risk of a legal and physical log-jam in space.  The congestion and space-junk problems are projected to become even more acute as the space race broadens its participants.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

Five States join calls for a moratorium on deep-sea mining at the 29th Session of the International Seabed Authority

During the 29th annual session of the International Seabed Authority (“ISA”), Malta, Tuvalu, Honduras, Guatemala and Austria declared their support for a precautionary pause on deep-sea mining.  To date, now over thirty States have called for a halt in the exploitation of the deep seabed minerals.  These calls come as the ISA struggles to adopt a final set of regulations on mining exploitation.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

European Union set to exit the Energy Charter Treaty, citing EU deadlock on proposed climate change reforms

On 30 May 2024, the European Council adopted decisions enabling the European Union (“EU”) to denounce (the proper international law term for ‘withdraw from’)  the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”). 

Learn more

| Client Alerts

The Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Accord: Progress and Challenges

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant gaps in the global health system, leading to immense human and economic losses.  In response, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) and its member States decided to draft a comprehensive international treaty—the Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Accord.

Learn more
View all