Published on 27 January 2017 in Client Alerts
On 24 January 2017, the International Trade Committee of the European Parliament voted in favour of approving the Canada-European Union (“EU”) Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (“CETA” or the “Agreement”). After a nearly nine-year process of consultations, negotiation and legal review, the CETA therefore took one crucial step closer to its provisional entry into force.
The Agreement must now be approved by the European Parliament, in a vote scheduled for February 2017. Canada is engaged in a similar parliamentary approval process. Both parties anticipate a positive outcome. Once parliamentary approval is secured, those aspects of the Agreement falling exclusively within EU competency will provisionally be applied as of April 2017.
Provisional entry into force will grant Canadian and European businesses the advantages of virtually all aspects of the Agreement, including:
Overall, the provisional entry into force of the CETA stands to provide European and Canadian business immediate, substantial new trading and investment advantages and access, as well as mechanisms to promote future enhancements to Canada-EU trade and investment conditions.
As for the aspects of the CETA not subject to provisional application, they include some substantive investment protections – notably, the specifically-defined “fair and equitable treatment” obligation, and protection against expropriation – as well as the proposed Investment Court System for enforcement of investor-State obligations. To the extent provisionally adopted, investment protections will be limited to “foreign direct investment” (i.e., excluding portfolio investment (passive minority shareholding)).
These carve-outs from provisional application reflect current controversies within the EU regarding the so-called “mixed competency” for investment protection, and related calls for parliamentary approval of these aspects of the Agreement by each Member State’s national parliament.
The latter approvals are not guaranteed. However, by the time full ratification is sought, the advantages of the Agreement in terms of enhanced trade and investment conditions should already be apparent, and its effects felt. National parliaments may be reluctant to put in jeopardy these advantages. In this way, provisional entry into force of the CETA could help haul the Agreement over the ultimate finish line.
Pending full entry into force of the CETA’s investment protections, existing foreign investment promotion and protection agreements (“FIPAs”) between Canada and a range of Eastern European States will remain in force. These existing protections therefore should remain an important consideration for Canadian businesses structuring investments in Europe, and vice versa.
The global awards Lexology Index (formerly Who’s Who Legal) recognised three of Volterra Fietta’s lawyers in its 2025 edition for Arbitration. Partner Robert Volterra is once again recognised as a “Recommended” lawyer, a title given to individuals considered leaders in their field. Robert’s achievement highlights over three decades of expertise and recognition in the field
Learn moreBarbados completed the first ever debt swap for climate resilience. The transaction generates USD 125 million for Barbados in fiscal savings, which it will use “to enhance water resource management and increase water and food security”. Barbados is a small island developing State, which is facing the destructive effects of climate change. The climate crisis
Learn moreOn 21 November 2024, Volterra Fietta partner Ahmed Abdel-Hakam was appointed to the International Law Committee of the New York City Bar Association. Ahmed’s selection by the New York City Bar Association was made despite the fact that he is not a member of the Association or even qualified to practice in New York. It
Learn moreThis autumn, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled on several significant matters, underscoring the institution’s role in shaping EU law and foreign policy. For reference, the CJEU comprises two courts: the General Court, which primarily handles actions for annulment brought by individuals, companies, and, in some cases, EU governments; and the
Learn more