Published on 27 January 2017 in Client Alerts

CETA moves a step closer to provisional application

On 24 January 2017, the International Trade Committee of the European Parliament voted in favour of approving the Canada-European Union (“EU”) Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (“CETA” or the “Agreement”).   After a nearly nine-year process of consultations, negotiation and legal review, the CETA therefore took one crucial step closer to its provisional entry into force.

The Agreement must now be approved by the European Parliament, in a vote scheduled for February 2017.   Canada is engaged in a similar parliamentary approval process.  Both parties anticipate a positive outcome.  Once parliamentary approval is secured, those aspects of the Agreement falling exclusively within EU competency will provisionally be applied as of April 2017.

Provisional entry into force will grant Canadian and European businesses the advantages of virtually all aspects of the Agreement, including:

Overall, the provisional entry into force of the CETA stands to provide European and Canadian business immediate, substantial new trading and investment advantages and access, as well as mechanisms to promote future enhancements to Canada-EU trade and investment conditions.

As for the aspects of the CETA not subject to provisional application, they include some substantive investment protections – notably, the specifically-defined “fair and equitable treatment” obligation, and protection against expropriation – as well as the proposed Investment Court System for enforcement of investor-State obligations.  To the extent provisionally adopted, investment protections will be limited to “foreign direct investment” (i.e., excluding portfolio investment (passive minority shareholding)).

These carve-outs from provisional application reflect current controversies within the EU regarding the so-called “mixed competency” for investment protection, and related calls for parliamentary approval of these aspects of the Agreement by each Member State’s national parliament.

The latter approvals are not guaranteed.  However, by the time full ratification is sought, the advantages of the Agreement in terms of enhanced trade and investment conditions should already be apparent, and its effects felt.  National parliaments may be reluctant to put in jeopardy these advantages.   In this way, provisional entry into force of the CETA could help haul the Agreement over the ultimate finish line.

Pending full entry into force of the CETA’s investment protections, existing foreign investment promotion and protection agreements (“FIPAs”) between Canada and a range of Eastern European States will remain in force.  These existing protections therefore should remain an important consideration for Canadian businesses structuring investments in Europe, and vice versa.

More Client Alerts

| Client Alerts

European Commission set to adopt first European Space Law

In the brief 60 years of space flight, humanity has sent over 60,000 space objects and 1 million pieces of smaller debris into orbit around the planet.  This has created the risk of a legal and physical log-jam in space.  The congestion and space-junk problems are projected to become even more acute as the space race broadens its participants.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

Five States join calls for a moratorium on deep-sea mining at the 29th Session of the International Seabed Authority

During the 29th annual session of the International Seabed Authority (“ISA”), Malta, Tuvalu, Honduras, Guatemala and Austria declared their support for a precautionary pause on deep-sea mining.  To date, now over thirty States have called for a halt in the exploitation of the deep seabed minerals.  These calls come as the ISA struggles to adopt a final set of regulations on mining exploitation.

Learn more

| Client Alerts

European Union set to exit the Energy Charter Treaty, citing EU deadlock on proposed climate change reforms

On 30 May 2024, the European Council adopted decisions enabling the European Union (“EU”) to denounce (the proper international law term for ‘withdraw from’)  the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”). 

Learn more

| Client Alerts

The Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Accord: Progress and Challenges

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant gaps in the global health system, leading to immense human and economic losses.  In response, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) and its member States decided to draft a comprehensive international treaty—the Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Accord.

Learn more
View all